Kirstie Allsopp Did NOT Neglect Her Son. Period. – Free-Range Kids

Share Article


The latest parenting insanity is coming from England:  Popular TV personality Kirstie Allsopp let her 15-year-old son go on a 3-week train trip around Europe with his 16-year-old buddy — and found herself under investigation by child protective services.
Here’s the happy tweet that started it all:
Kirstie Tweet 1

Kirstie’s story inspired a lot of folks nostalgically recalling their own youthful travels. But then, as dusk must follow dawn, the trolls followed the fans: He’s too young, the Twitterverse spat. Anything could have happened! The world is unsafe and so is Kirstie Allsopp! 

.

Kirstie punched back. Sure, every kid is different, but “the danger is in underestimating them, not in setting them free,” she told the world. Her mother-in-law, she noted, went off to college at 15. Her father-in-law joined the Merchant Navy in World War II. Somehow they did this even before SIM cards and Google Maps! Were their parents neglectful?

.

Well, I guess that depends on who you ask. Because here’s the text she got from the Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea (RBKC) — her local Child Protective Services:

Kirstie Cps Screenshot

The social worker told Kirstie that she was obliged, by law, to look into any case that anyone called into the agency.

.

Kirstie asked who had made the call. The agency would not say. (Same thing happens here.) Kirstie tried to explain it was probably someone who disapproved from afar and was trying to teach her a lesson. (Like this case.) The agency said that didn’t matter. It added that Kirstie’s file would remain open and that it was “standard practice” for a case to remain open till the child turned 25.

That’s quite a long definition of “child.”

.

So here’s the deal: We all know Child Protective Services agencies exist for a reason. Their job is to protect children from serious neglect and abuse.

.

Not from parents allowing their kids to do things on their own that they know their kids can handle — including the bumps that of course are part of any trip. A parents’ job is not to make sure their kids never encounter any challenges. Ideally, it is to make sure they can handle them. “Prepare your child for the path…not the path for your child.”

.

The problem in this case is not only the blood sport of mom-blaming in our culture. It’s also that the government is given no freedom to err on the side of common sense. They are obligated to be obtuse. So perhaps all we need to do is fight fire with fire: If the goal of Child Protective Services is to keep kids safe, let’s at least put children’s mental health on one side of the scale. Yes, a child on a train trip might get lost, or fall on a cobblestone, or even (as her son almost was) get pickpocketed.

.

But kids kept overprotected long after they are ready to start being part of the world are in danger, too, of depression, anxiety and passivity. There’s a danger in keeping kids in the passenger seat of their lives when they’re more than ready to take the wheel.

.

Kirstie herself admits she said no, when her son first proposed the trip. But then she thought about it more and realized he was ready for this adventure, and that it was her job as a GOOD parent to safeguard his confidence, self-respect, development and joy in life BY LETTING HIM GO.

You might say she let go…to Let Grow. (Yes, shameless plug for the nonprofit that grew out of Free-Range Kids!)

.

So I salute Kirstie for growing, too, and for embodying the Let Grow motto, “When adults step back, kids step up.” And for pushing back on a culture that allows outsiders too much sway over the everyday decisions of decent parents. As she so pithily put it: “It’s up to parents to decide who is or isn’t grown up enough to start spreading their wings.”

.

Amen. And if you’d like to make sure your own local laws here in the U.S. do not mistake parental confidence for child neglect, here is information Let Grow’s legislative efforts. So far eight states have passed “Reasonable Childhood Independence” laws stating that neglect is when you put your child in serious, obvious, unreasonable danger — not anytime you let them do something on their own.

.

Your state could be next!

And Kirstie — maybe it’s time for a law like this in your country, too?

You might also like